For coaches building agency
Ask what the person believes the chain is attached to. Then look for evidence together. The next move should create agency, not dependency on the coach.
Sometimes the strongest barrier is the one we still believe exists. This newsletter pairs one human story with the lion presentation and a practical development plan.
The lion does not need more strength. The chain is no longer attached. What holds the lion in place is the belief that the old boundary still exists.
Leaders and coaches meet this pattern every day. Past failure becomes a rule. Imposter feelings become proof. An outdated assumption becomes a wall. Advice alone rarely changes that. Good coaching helps a person examine the boundary, notice current evidence, and take one honest step.
Organizations can plan the objective, evaluate the software, install safeguards, train users, and still watch adoption stall. The technical work may be sound. The human experience may still be full of uncertainty, exclusion, fear of failure, and a loss of confidence.
When people return to an old process, leaders often call it resistance. That label is convenient and usually incomplete. People may be protecting competence, status, belonging, or their ability to succeed. The visible behavior is only the surface.
Ask what the person believes the chain is attached to. Then look for evidence together. The next move should create agency, not dependency on the coach.
Ask what people may lose, what remains unclear, and whose experience was absent from the design. Go-live marks a technical milestone. Adoption begins much earlier.
This story is fictional. It combines common leadership patterns and does not describe one person or organization.
Mara had led a department for six years. People described her as steady, prepared, and thoughtful. In the senior leadership meeting, she noticed the implementation timeline assumed her team could absorb new work without giving anything up. She opened her notebook and wrote the concern down.
Then she stayed quiet.
A year earlier, Mara had questioned a different rollout. Her leader answered quickly, explained why the decision had already been made, and moved to the next agenda item. No one punished her. No one needed to. She learned that speaking carried a cost and changed very little.
After the meeting, two peers found her in the hallway. They had noticed the same problem. The concern was now moving sideways because none of them believed it could move upward.
Her coach did not tell her to be braver. Instead, the coach asked, “What evidence says the chain is still attached, and what evidence would you need before taking one step?” Mara prepared one observation, one likely impact, and one question. At the next meeting, she spoke before certainty could talk her out of it.
The room did not collapse. Her leader paused, asked for the workload data, and changed part of the rollout. The larger shift came later: Mara stopped treating one old response as a permanent rule.
Watch the complete lion story here on the page.
Play the full story ↗This keeps the downloadable 17-slide Invisible Chain presentation from BRITER 4.0 available inside 3.0, alongside the Canva story and development plan.
The visual story that begins with complexity, follows the lion, and connects awareness to the human experience of change.
Lindy PfingstenIf someone is standing where the old chain used to be, more instruction alone may not help. Name an experience, make sense of it, invite support, and learn a focused skill. Use these four parts together; the percentages are a design guide, not a score for a person.
What meaningful work would let the person test a new possibility with appropriate support?
What did the experience show about the person's assumptions and the conditions around them?
Who can listen, offer perspective, and help the person notice what is different?
What small piece of knowledge or practice would strengthen the next attempt?
Return to the lion story after trying the plan: what was the chain attached to, and what changed when you tested it?
Explore what identity carries into the room, then connect your insight to a practical development cycle.
Explore What Are You Carrying? →Before changing the person, inspect the system. Before rebuilding the system, listen to the people living inside it. Then decide whether the next move requires redesign, coaching, or both.
Explore the Reflective Coaching Method →